<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: the problem with anti-smoking	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mendellee.com/2009/05/21/the-problem-with-anti-smoking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mendellee.com/2009/05/21/the-problem-with-anti-smoking/</link>
	<description>composer • performer • educator • entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 22:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: darknote		</title>
		<link>https://mendellee.com/2009/05/21/the-problem-with-anti-smoking/comment-page-1/#comment-2253</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darknote]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknote.org/?p=73#comment-2253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i think that a paradigm shift could change that, especially given how more conscious of that our culture has become.  Again, i feel okay about non-smoking policies in restaurants, but suppose we went back to a smoking/non-smoking area policy; you could have that option with the employees as well, and have it so that these non-smokers who are concerned about second-hand smoke only wait on the non-smoking section, and the ones who don&#039;t care one way or the other can serve in the smoking section or either section.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that a paradigm shift could change that, especially given how more conscious of that our culture has become.  Again, i feel okay about non-smoking policies in restaurants, but suppose we went back to a smoking/non-smoking area policy; you could have that option with the employees as well, and have it so that these non-smokers who are concerned about second-hand smoke only wait on the non-smoking section, and the ones who don&#8217;t care one way or the other can serve in the smoking section or either section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew S		</title>
		<link>https://mendellee.com/2009/05/21/the-problem-with-anti-smoking/comment-page-1/#comment-2249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknote.org/?p=73#comment-2249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The no-smoking laws are there primarily for the benefit of the employees who work in those establishments. You could argue in theory that those employees should just go work for a non-smoking establishment, but in blue collar jobs having such choices is not always an option. It&#039;s a lot easier for a diner to pick a different restaurant than a waiter to find a new job.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The no-smoking laws are there primarily for the benefit of the employees who work in those establishments. You could argue in theory that those employees should just go work for a non-smoking establishment, but in blue collar jobs having such choices is not always an option. It&#8217;s a lot easier for a diner to pick a different restaurant than a waiter to find a new job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
